A group of U.S. business associations has filed a lawsuit in federal court in Sherman, Texas to stop a Biden administration rule that would require employers to pay overtime premiums to 4 million workers who currently do not receive them. The groups argue that the U.S. Department of Labor does not have the authority to implement the rule and that it would result in job cuts and reduced hours for workers.
The proposed rule would require employers to pay overtime premiums to workers who earn less than $58,600 per year when they work more than 40 hours in a week. This is higher than the current threshold of about $35,500 per year, which was established by the Trump administration in 2020. Advocacy groups and many Democrats have criticized this threshold as inadequate.
The business groups behind the lawsuit argue that complying with the new rule would lead to many smaller employers and non-profits having to make cuts to critical programs, staffing, and services. They believe that the rule would place an undue burden on businesses, especially those with limited financial resources.
The Department of Labor did not offer a comment on the lawsuit. The agency has defended the rule by highlighting that lower-paid salaried workers often perform the same tasks as hourly employees but work longer hours without extra pay. The groups involved in the lawsuit include the National Federation of Independent Business, the International Franchise Association, and the National Retail Federation.
Under the proposed rule, the salary threshold would gradually increase to $58,656 by January 2025, with automatic adjustments every three years thereafter to account for changes in average earnings. The lawsuit is ongoing, and its outcome will have significant implications for millions of American workers and businesses.
The business groups behind this legal action are concerned that implementing this new overtime rule could lead to job cuts and reduced hours for their employees while also placing an undue burden on their finances.
However, advocacy groups such as unions have criticized this move saying it will benefit only low-wage workers who are already receiving little or no benefits from their jobs.
The debate surrounding this issue highlights how different perspectives can shape policy decisions made by governments or organizations.
