The Supreme Court’s recent decision to grant judicial immunity in the case of the invasion of the Capitol could have positive implications for other cases against Donald Trump. In a landmark ruling, the Court stated that former presidents can claim immunity for official acts carried out during their time in office. However, there is no immunity for unofficial acts. This decision was reached by a 6-3 vote and could impact ongoing cases against Trump in the American justice system.
The immunity case before the Supreme Court originated from a federal court in Washington where Trump was indicted on three counts related to his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and instigate the Capitol attack. The distinction made by the Court between Trump’s public and private actions could have ramifications for various legal cases against him. While actions taken while he was president are immune, those taken in the private sphere may still be subject to legal action.
Experts like Roberto Uebel and Ricardo Caichiolo believe that the Supreme Court’s decision could affect the outcome of the cases against Trump. They suggest that his defense lawyers may use this decision to delay or annul the legal proceedings. This decision is seen as a victory for the Republican candidate as it could prevent further trials before the upcoming elections and potentially impact any convictions related to the 2020 election results.
The new legal scenario created by the Supreme Court’s decision is expected to strengthen Trump’s narrative of innocence in the face of multiple accusations. Uebel suggests that this decision, combined with Trump’s recent debate performance, has bolstered his position and could be used as a strategic advantage in his electoral campaign. Despite some controversies, Trump’s camp is framing this decision as a total victory in the American justice system.
