The British government’s stance towards Israel has undergone a significant shift in the months following the October 7 terrorist attack. Initially, the British government pledged unqualified support for Israel, with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak expressing “unlimited support for Israel in the face of evil” just a few days after the attack. Foreign Minister James Calverley also expressed support for Israel’s right to defend itself.
However, as time passed and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsened, British promises began to change. Today, Britain is threatening to impose an arms embargo on Israel if it invades Rafah. The British government has been critical of Israel’s role in the crisis and has voted in favor of a resolution calling for a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza without condemning Hamas for the attacks.
The change in British position can be attributed to several factors, including public opinion. Large pro-Palestinian sentiments have emerged among the British public, and criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza has influenced foreign policy decisions. Additionally, a recent survey showed low support for Israeli military activity in Gaza and higher sympathy for Palestinians among Britons.
The British Foreign Office is now exploring the possibility that Israel may be violating international law in Gaza, which could lead to a cancellation of arms export licenses to Israel. This marks a significant departure from previous British support for Israel and reflects a new and tougher approach towards the conflict in the region. The next steps in British-Israeli relations remain uncertain as both governments grapple with their stance on ongoing tensions between them.
In conclusion, while initially supporting Israel with unwavering determination after October 7 terrorist attack by providing unlimited military aid through its Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, Britain seems to have shifted its stance towards a more critical one towards Israeli actions in Gaza over six months later due to various reasons such as public opinion and continued military operations leading to high Palestinian casualties which are likely to have influenced its foreign policy decisions towards Israel.
