Milanović, the president of Croatia, announced on Friday that he would participate in the parliamentary elections on April 17 as an independent and non-partisan candidate on the SDP list. He stated his intention to become prime minister if successful. However, on Monday, the Constitutional Court ruled that as the president of the country, Milanović cannot simultaneously run for parliament.
This decision has garnered attention from international media outlets like Reuters, dpa, and Bloomberg. Reuters highlighted that Milanović was ordered to resign from the presidency if he wished to pursue a parliamentary candidacy. Meanwhile, dpa characterized this ruling as thwarting Milanović’s plan for running for parliamentary office due to disputes with Prime Minister Andrej Plenković over controversial policies.
Bloomberg raised concerns about a potential constitutional crisis resulting from Milanović’s defiance of the court’s decision due to his popularity and contrasting positions on Russia and Ukraine. The American agency AP also emphasized how Milošević’s actions impacted Croatia’s international relationships and raised the possibility of a government crisis if he does not comply with the court’s ruling.
In addition to global coverage, regional media outlets like STA, Tanjug, and Beta have also highlighted constitutional violation issues raised by the court. Milanović’s intentions to continue with his parliamentary candidacy despite this ruling have stirred controversy within Croatian politics, with implications for governmental stability and balance of power.
The French media has characterized Milošević as a polarizing figure in Croatian politics, aligning him with left opposition forces while contrasting his views with those of Prime Minister Plenković. APA emphasizes the significance of Milošević’s role in government formation post-election and highlights its potential consequences on Croatia’s political landscape.
Overall, Milošević’s announcement of his intention to participate in parliamentary elections has sparked controversy both nationally and internationally. While there may be different opinions regarding his actions and their impact on Croatian politics, it is clear that this issue will continue to be closely monitored by local and global media outlets until it is resolved one way or another.
